Once you have stated your thesis, then the body paragraphs need to provide just the right amount of support. Each paragraph needs to have a topic sentence that will reconnect to the thesis without being too repetitive. Then, you will need to have extremely strong support for your stance on animal rights. While the introductory paragraph is important to get the reader interested in what you have to say, the body paragraphs need to include the most convincing facts that you can find. Without facts and examples, you will never be able to convince anyone to agree with what you have to say in your animal rights persuasive essays.Persuasive Essay On Animal Rights Free Essays
Animal Rights”: Persuasive Essay Tips
When you are ready to organize your animal rights persuasive essay, the introductory paragraph is one of the most important parts of the essay to consider. Every persuasive essay needs to have a strong introductory sentence in order to hook the readers into wanting to read more of your essay. It is also important to have a clear and thought provoking thesis statement, as well as sentences that bridge the introduction and thesis, so that the introductory paragraph does not feel choppy.Persuasive Speech: Animal Rights - Angelfire
Animal rights essays aim to persuade a reader in the importance of taking care of animals rights. Like a persuasive essay on any other topic, your animal rights persuasive essay must be done in accordance with the standard structure.
Information presented at the official websites of organizations dealing with animals rights will help you best. So, make use of information provided by AACT (Against Animals Cruelty Tasmania), VHS (Vancouver Humane Society), IAL (International Animal-Law), etc. to supply your essay on animal rights with the experts’ viewpoints and some statistical data.
Once you get a general picture of the ongoing process of designing new strategies to defend animal rights, think over a thesis statement for your animal rights essay. Good essays on animal rights introduce a problem in a catchy way.
Now let us consider the structure according to which animal rights persuasive essay should be written.
Free animal rights Essays and Papers - 123helpme
Animals are great little creatures. They give pleasure on many different levels. They are they for beauty, comfort, and love. Animals are creatures of the world that are here for those reasons. We as humans were creatures as animals long ago, but we’ve evolved. Most animals have evolved too, but that does not give them the same right as a human being.
I support Machan’s views on animal rights and livelihood. Animals should not be granted with the same right as we are, as humans. Animals are not even close to being in the same league as humans. Yes animals can feel pain and emotion, but that does not give them rights to freedom that humans have.
I think that the treatment of animals should be learned at a young age. Growing up on a farm, I learned how to treat animals. There is a certain amount of respect that everyone should give to animals. You shouldn’t really be cruel to them. What is the purpose of making a living thing suffer? There is no purpose and its just wrong.
Being on a farm you know the boundaries when it comes to animals and yourself. I had pets and then I had animals. Cats and dogs are usually the favorites when it comes to having pets. They give you pleasure. Chickens and ducks were there for the sole purpose to be eaten, sold, or for eggs. When on a farm, you grow attached to certain animals more easily than others. I would never get attached to cows, because I knew that they wouldn’t be around very long. We would process them. That’s what they are for. I mean I can’t really say that animals are solely here on this planet for our purposes, but when it comes down to my well being, the animal’s life is not really considered.
When driving down a road late at night or during the day. Are you a person that will swerve and dodge an animal or will or will you run it over for your own safety? When it comes down to the safety of myself over an animal, I’m more than likely going to choose my safety. Some people will swerve clean off the damn road to miss a cute, fluffy bunny rabbit. That’s just utterly insane in my book. I can’t believe some people will risk their own lives—their precious life experience—over an animal’s well being.
Animals behave instinctively a lot different than we do as humans. When was the last time someone wanted to eat or kill his or her children because it felt right? Well, it might happen, but you’re going to be in jail for the rest of your life. Animals eat and kill their own species or offspring. Mother dogs will kill or push out their young ones if they are sick or can’t keep up with the rest of the bunch. It also happens with fish, birds, cats, rodents, and many other wild creatures. If we were to give animals the same rights as humans we would have to kill or punish the animals if they were to do such acts. Guess what, we don’t because that would be ridiculous and it would interfere with the natural selection process that goes hand in hand with nature.
Machan makes a great point on animals rights when he discusses human evolution. We have been evolving and will continue to evolve through time. Machan says, “The process that leads to our success involves learning…” To learn we must experiment and use trial and error. This involves the animal testing issue. This is where it starts getting hard to determine the rights of animals. Some of the tests being performed on the animals are not really your idea of a nice walk in the park. Some tests are extremely cruel and unnecessary. I think anyone testing cosmetics on animals should try to find alternatives. For example, spraying hair spray in an animal’s eye to see what kind of reaction comes forth is ridiculous. I think that animal testing should happen, but it should be done in the most humane way possible. Rats and mice are what I feel should be used when testing. I think that if they are bred for this purpose there is nothing really wrong with it. They are small, mindless creatures. When dealing with medical testing, I think that the best thing to do is to use animals in the process. Machan says,
“ to find out whether some medicine is safe for human use, we might wish to use animals. To do this is the rational thing for us to do, so as to make the best use of nature for our success in living our lives.
Finding the cure for AIDS or cancer will probably involve testing of an animal of some kind. I’m for the use of animals as long as it is in a secure way and no extreme cruelty is involved.
I would like to address the subject of hunting dealing with animal rights. Hunting has been done from the beginning of time. Animals hunt to survive and it was how our ancestors survived. With the technology we have know, there is really no need for a person to go hunting to feed his family. There are other reasons that come to surface. Hunting is a way to control the population of animals, especially whitetail deer. In Missouri it is more of a problem. When hunting animals, there should be respect for the kill. Hunters should never use illegal practices to kill something, if they do it just show poor character. It should be a naturally hunted kill. Most hunters hunt because they love the thrill and most hunters have great respect for the animals they hunt. If you hunt and eat what you kill there is nothing wrong with killing an animal.
When I was a young boy, I would go and kill things just to kill things. Male aggression is the only reason I can think of why I did such things. But it felt and seemed ok. I had a pellet gun and would go shot birds and cut them open. I was very curious. I would do the same to frogs and fish. Some people would say that this is humane, but I think that it is part of our natural instincts. We are curious minded beings, and the same thing goes on with animals. Many times I have caught my house cat killing rabbits or rats to just kill them. They would not eat them, just plain out kill them and walk around with the dead animal in their mouth. If you were to watch some discovery channel on young animals, especially meat eating animals, the same instinct applies. Animals are curious as we are, and kill to kill. Of course, I’m not out killing things for the fun of it, but it was a phase that I think most boys go through. I just wanted to point that out and say that there is really nothing wrong with it, and that it is natural.
As far as Stone’s essay, I thought it was rather uninteresting compared to Machan’s essay. Stone really wasn’t directing this thoughts toward animals, but rather towards the whole spectrum of nature. As boring as the essay was he had a point, and I agree with him on come points. Nature should be protected in a court of law, if it is a justifiable reason. I mean, if someone is polluting a stream, and the person knows they are polluting the stream, there should be some kind of punishment. Because that water that is being polluted is water that we may consume in some way. So, they are directly affect humans. But even forest fires, if you can prove that someone caused it, then the person starting the fire should be punished. Most people have enough common sense to not go around and start forest fires. But there are sick-minded people out there. Nature takes care of itself, it always has. We should try little as possible to not interfere with the natural cycle that goes on.
ATTENTION. HotEssays.blogspot.com provides free sample essays and essay examples on any topics and subjects. EssayLib.com essay writing service produces 100% custom essays, term papers & research papers, written by quality essay writers only. The prices start from $11 per page. You can order a custom essay on Animal Rights now!
Are you in search of free sample essays and essay examples on different topics? Do you need urgent assistance in writing high school, college or university academic papers? We are your best solution for you. Our site is specifically designed for those students who need instant writing help in any discipline.
HotEssays is a huge collection of free examples of essays and samples written by professional writers who are masters of their craft.
At HotEssays you can find useful writing guidelines on how to write good essays making your academic writing successful, effective and interesting. Step-by-step essay writing tips will facilitate your perception of our articles.
Here you will find also different types of samples such as persuasive / argumentative, critical, descriptive, narrative, cause and effect, exploratory, expository, compare and contrast, 5-paragraph, classification, definition and even scholarship / admission essay papers for your application. All academic essays are formatted in any citation style: APA, MLA, Turabian and Harvard format.
HotEssays.blogspot.com contains interesting essays on the best and popular writing topics. Here you can find essays in more than 70 subjects such as Business, Marketing, Psychology, Management, Law, Philosophy, English, Literature, Accounting, Finance, Nursing, Medicine, Political Science, Communication, IT, Chemistry, Computer Science, Physics, Math, Anthropology, Geography, American / English History, Geology, Engineering, Biology, Sociology and Social studies, Art, Sports, Music, Economics, International Studies, Tourism etc.
See Why Helpmyessay.com is the most trusted website for custom sample essays on animal rights .
The reason why students utilize our service is because they simply do not know how to write a high quality essay or cite properly within the text. Writing an essay on animal rights can be extremely difficult, which is why our writers work around the clock to provide you the best sample essay, which you can then use as a template/guideline/reference in helping you write your own paper. All our papers contain work cited page with recent sources, so you can easily locate relevant sources on animal rights .Top 5 Reasons to Purchase a animal rights essay or research paper with us!
Essay Instructions: I am against testing make-up on animals.
I'm not 100% sure, but I know there are printable skin-cells made. I'm not sure if those skins are usable for testing instead of animals. Would be nice to include something about it. since not many people know about these special printers.
^please try and ind academic sources only.
also. I know that some companies would list their products as "not tested on animals". but in fact, they use results of OTHER companies who have tested their chemicals/products on animals. would be nice to mention something about that.
Is it possible for you to create the annotated bibliography (5 sources) before the 17th. I need that earlier. Please let me know ASAP.
Develop a feasible research topic about animalrights .
. Find and evaluate a variety of sources on your chosen topic.
. Develop a deeper understanding of the issues involved based on careful reading of
. Use those same scholarly sources to explain your topic and support your point of view.
This assignment asks to you to write a scholarly research paper on the question of animalrights .
Possible areas of research include, but are not limited to, the ethics of keeping a pet, the treatment of animals in the livestock industry, and the conservation of wild animal habitats. Your topic should be divisive or contentious enough that there are at least two sides to the issue, with some advocating for, and some against. Once you have chosen a topic, you should then develop a research question related to the topic you will pursue. From there, you must establish a thesis
that reflects your position, the claim that you will make and subsequently follow through on.
Your essay should be between 1300 and 1500 words. In it you must cite at least 5 scholarly
sources. All 5 of your sources must come from either a peer-reviewed academic journal or
scholarly book, either online or in print. Though Wikipedia may be useful as a finding aid,
you should not use it as a scholarly source. For dictionary definitions, please use the Oxford
English Dictionary (available online through the library). All references to your sources, as well
as the paper itself, must be in proper MLA format.
Your essay should:
. Make an argument, not just report on the topic.
. Develop the argument fully, with effective choice and use of evidence.
. Meet the usual standards for clear, coherent and concise writing.
. Introduce, integrate and document source material correctly.
Essay Instructions: Zoos argue that they save endangered species and educate the public, but animalrights activists believe the costs outweigh the benefits, and the violation of the rights of the individual animals is unjustifiable.
Write a paper on whether it is ethical or unethical to keep animals in captivity, be clear and concise in your writing and state your thesis. Provide some examples from scientific researches and articles to support your response.
Title: Should animals have the same rights as people
"I live in Los Angeles incase you choose to refer to any zoo" LA Zoo
Essay Instructions: The question:
"Should animals have the same rights as people? Animals have feelings and can understand, at least in a primitive way, they therefore have rights ."
This is a philosophy paper so a strong self opinion must be formed. You can argue pro or con, it does not matter.
The way you argue the side you choose is the most important.
Please have three facts as proof. Googling "pro con animalrights " is good enough.
“I really do appreciate HelpMyEssay.com. I'm not a good writer and the service really gets me going in the right direction. The staff gets back to me quickly with any concerns that I might have and they are always on time.’’Tiffany R
“I have had all positive experiences with HelpMyEssay.com. I will recommend your service to everyone I know. Thank you!’’Charlotte H
“I am finished with school thanks to HelpMyEssay.com. They really did help me graduate college.’’Bill K
A Discussion on Animal Rights
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; The Declaration of Independence holds these rights to be self evident and unalienable. In the eighteenth century when these words were written they were called natural rights, today we call them human rights" (McShea 34). The issue of whether or not to grant animal rights such as those that humans retain, is a greatly disputed issue. Philosophers, clergyman, and politicians have argued the point of animal rights for years, but without success. Animal right is an extremely intricate issue that involves the question of animal intelligence, animal activist groups, and the pros and cons of granting animals their rights.
Psychologists around the world, who have studied nonhuman primates, argue that these animals possess the capacity to communicate. They go on to explain that a communication barrier is all that separates humans from animals. If they bridged that barrier, then humans could talk with animals. Beatrice and Robert Gardner, two psychologists of the University of Nevada, realized that the pharynx and larynx of the chimpanzee are not suited for human speech. Since chimpanzees are far superior to humans in manual dexterity, the Garners decided to try to teach chimpanzees American Sign Language or Ameslan. The Gardners and others studied these chimpanzees, Washoe, Lucy, and Lana. These three chimpanzees learned to use and could display a working vocabulary of 100 to 200 words. They also distinguished between different grammatical patterns and syntaxes (Sagan 615). Besides distinguishing, the chimpanzees also inventively constructed new words and phrases. For example, when Washoe first saw a duck land on water, she gestured "water bird," which is the same phrase used in English. Washoe invented that gesture for the occasion (Sagan 615). Lucy also displayed her creative mind by signing "candy drink" after tasting a watermelon. The description "candy drink" is essentially the same word form as the English "water melon" (Sagan 615).
Another method of bridging the communication gap between humans and animals is by computer. At the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Georgia, researchers teach chimpanzees like Lana a specific computer language called "Yerkish" (Sagan 616). "Yerkish" allows the chimpanzees to talk with the computer by keyboarding in messages. The computer in turn responds appropriately. While Lana types, she monitors her sentences on a computer display and erases those sentences with grammatical errors. At one point while Lana typed an intricate sentence, her trainer mischievously and repeatedly interfered with her typing from a separate console. Lana, who had become aggravated by this, typed, "Please, Tim, leave room." (Sagan 616).
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, is a nonviolent animal rights organization. They enforce the ideals that any exploitation of animals by humans is wrong and should be abolished. PETA, formed by Alex Pacheo and Ingrid Newkirk in 1984, has grown from a handful of members to an organization with more than 35,000 members and a yearly income of over five million dollars (Dejar 70). They quote Ingrid Newkirk as saying, "A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy." (Tapply 71). This quotation of Newkirk's states her purpose in organizing PETA and it also provides a platform of ideals for PETA.
They call another pro-animals group the Animal Liberation Front, or ALF. ALF commits violent and illegal acts to make sure that their point is apparent to all. Like PETA, ALF also seeks to end all human exploitation of animals, but unlike PETA, ALF will use any means possible to achieve their goal. ALF originated in England in 1974 by a man named Ronnie Lee. An anonymous woman who goes by the pseudonym "Valerie," organized the American branch of the ALF after training in terrorist techniques in England. The American ALF made their American.
Please sign up to read full document.YOU MAY ALSO FIND THESE DOCUMENTS HELPFUL
AnimalRights “What is man without the beast? If the beast were gone, man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beast soon happens to man” (Chief Seattle). While much has been done to protect animals . it is nowhere near what needs to be done to secure their inhabitance on earth and give them their rights . Animals have nerves so they can feel pain and they do suffer so is it right to put them through that by experimenting on them? Additionally if more of the world’s animals are not protected a lot more will be extinct in the coming years. Finally hunting, in almost all areas, is no longer a way to gain food as it used to be, it is now just done for pure sport or “fun“. Should animals have to suffer just to benefit a single race of beings? And what does it feel like to be hunted down in terror and then torn apart while still alive? In this society, it is under law for all people to have the basic rights under the universal declaration of human rights . As stated, this only benefits humans, where humans rule the world. So where does the rights of animals come from? Many people do not understand animalrights and how we should treat them equally and why. Through animal research and experimentations, humans are getting benefit.
4143 Words | 6 Pages
Non-Human AnimalRights Do non-human animals have rights . Animalrights debates are incredibly controversial. Animalrights activists argue for animal’s rights whereas others argue that animals have no rights . Animals have many rights . which is why there are laws set in place to protect animals . Animals have rights to protect themselves from animal cruelty. When taking into consideration animalrights . humans need to consider animalrights laws, animal abuse (using animals as food and testing), animalrights support groups, and animal cruelty stories. Animalrights is defined as “the rights of animals . claimed on ethical grounds, to the same humane treatment and protection from exploitation and abuse that are accorded to humans” according to ("Animalrights | Define Animalrights at Dictionary.com"). According to ("Stray Pet Advocacy" par 4) Throughout the entire United States, there are laws prohibiting cruelty to animals to protect animals from human torture. Each state.
1132 Words | 5 Pages
AnimalRights Ever since The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in England in 1824 was formed there has been long running debates on the topic of animalrights . The first societies were formed to protect and maintain human treatment of work animals . such as cattle, horses and house hold pets. Towards the end of the 19th century more organizations were formed, this time to protest the use of animals in scientific experimentation. In today's society groups such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have continued these traditional fights as well as adding new agendas. These new agendas include hunting and fishing, and dissection of animals in science classes. This paper will discuss the pros and cons of animal experimentation and research, animals in the classroom, animal organizations and hunting. Along with these topics my personal opinion will be stated, before and after researching the topic. The rights of animals have always been important to me during my life. This is due to the fact that I have had a dog for a pet for as long as I remember. On this topic I feel as though having domesticated animals in the home is fine as long as proper care is taken of them. As for more controversial issue like animal research.
1358 Words | 4 Pages
Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience that animals should not be used in circuses. Central Idea: Eliminating the use of animals in circuses, will help with animal extinction and mistreatment. I. Attention How many of you, with a show of hands, have been to a circus? If not, have you at least seen clips or examples from movies or on television? From the look of those animals you wouldn’t exactly think that they are abused or mistreated. Here is a clip that will show you otherwise. (Show video from www.ringlingbeatsanimals.com) These animals are beaten, shocked, and even starved for the sake of entertainment. Persuasive Claim: Today I am here to persuade you that the abuse to animals in circuses is wrong and that there should be strict laws that prevent this abuse. Orienting Material In my presentation I am going to convince you why these strict laws should be put in place. I will first talk to you about Elephants and how between poachers and circuses, they are going extinct. Then I will show you the truth on how these circus animals are trained and treated. Credibility I feel that I am credible speaking to you about this topic because I have done extensive research on elephants and circus animals . Also, I’m credible because I am an advocate against the mistreatment of animals . Transition: Now, let me talk to you about.
1683 Words | 5 Pages
Analysis of a AnimalRights Cartoon The cartoon, The Battalion, is an argument showing a member of Peta with a sign defending animalrights . This marketing campaign is targeting those individuals not supportive of animalrights . The artist used a member of Peta with a picket sign and a couple animals in the background design to appeal to the emotions of the audience. A rabbit holding a sign that reads, “I’m with stupid”, suggest that animals are sentient beings. The artist is targeting people who are not for animalrights . and specifically those individuals that are cruel to animals . This population may have a limited emotional response for the humane treatment of animals . however, many take it seriously and have even made it a personal part of their everyday life. Some people of the audience who are for animalrights may not eat meat for example because of the way animals are treated on the farms and processing places they are taken to. Using animals for testing or consumption is seen by those supportive of animalrights as an unnecessary evil. Marketing campaigns designed to persuade those individuals who have not taken a positive or negative position on this issue are rampant. Those people who do not take the time.
802 Words | 3 Pages
The issue of animal experimentation is a widely debated topic in the United States. A fundamental question of this debate is whether the functions of animal testing and research are morally and ethically justified. In the viewpoint of the pro-research community, animal testing is a necessary practice. They support this position by stating that humans, instinctually, prioritize their own survival above other animals thus making any use of animals justifiable (Fox 5). The supporters of animal testing believe that it is illogical for humans to place anthropocentric values in animals citing that they can not be moral equals to mankind (Fox 3, 6). The animalrights faction holds belief in different viewpoints against the testing of animals in experiments. In the philosophy of the animalrights movement, it is asserted that non-human creatures are sentient beings and they are entitled to the same rights that humans have and that man has no place or authority to use these creatures as our means or modes of survival (Guither 9). They view the use of animals in experimentation as immoral and unethical and should be done away with. A compromise of these two conflicting viewpoints could be attained in stance of animal welfare. Animal welfare can be defined as a.
1564 Words | 4 Pages
ANIMALRIGHTS Did you have any idea how many animals were used as pets, as food, as prey and clothing, as entertainment, as experiment subjects? Have you ever seen cages crowded with chickens, and some live chicken living with dead chickens, or cows being placed on dirty barns where their head to toe are caked on mud and feces, or dogs that are tied outside the houses of inhumane owners not letting them have a shelter to stay with? Do animals deserve to have rights to a have a home, to feel loved, to have food and water, to have proper medical attention? All animals . especially those that live with us, such as dogs and cats, deserve to be treated with the same decency that we treat each other with. Animals are like human beings too. Let us first define what is AnimalRights . According to Wikipedia, the definition of animalrights is the idea that some or all nonhuman animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives, and that their most basic interests – such as an interest in not suffering – should be afforded the same consideration as the similar interests of human beings. In another definition, given by Merriam- Webster dictionary, it is primarily against being killed and being treaded cruelly, that are thought to be possessed by a higher human animals (e.g. chimpanzees) and many.
955 Words | 3 Pages
Animalrights has been one of the most peculiar and debated topics in the whole history of ethics. In the society we live in today, it is under law according to the declaration of human rights . for all people to have basic rights . such as liberty, personal security and equal treatment no matter nationality, skin color or sex. This law therefore excludes any form of slavery or any cruel and degrading treatment or punishment from happening, but as stated though, this regulation only benefits humans, as if they were the only form of life on planet Earth. The question then becomes clear. What about animals . are they protected as well? Many people in our days unfortunately don't seem to understand why animals should be protected and what having a right for them means. Animalrights is the idea that animals have the same rights as humans, to live free of suffrage, just as important as living individuals, and with the same moral status as humans. Is this today actually happening? This essay is specifically going to address the issue of animalrights through the examination of a particular branch, which is animal vivisection. Vivisection comes from the latin word ''vivus'' meaning alive and ''sectio'' meaning cutting. It is defined as surgery conducted for experimental purposes on a.
1882 Words | 5 Pages